| |
 |
Disability
is not Inability |
::Media:
Disability and the Media in the United Kingdom
By Simon Minty (simonminty@compuserve.com)
Good Practice
So what's the solution? Until disabled people become the producers,
the commissioning editors, the stars, it is hard to see one. Until
production teams have disabled technical professionals as a matter
of course, discriminatory practices may remain. Until writers
consider including a disabled character in their work because
they are an interesting or pivotal character to the story line,
irrespective of their disability, we have some way to go. Let's
not forget the occasional and welcome examples of good practice.
The British film, 'Four Weddings and a Funeral' has the lead character's
brother being deaf and a sign language user. He is central to
the plot, not cumbersome or forced, without pity and certainly
not depicted in a medical light. Sadly, this example along with
several notable others, are only the start in building a bridge
to gap the disparity between accurate disability portrayal and
the media's industry own out-dated view of disability.
One useful way of bridging this gap is by producing work to showcase
disability and the arts. Short films to get producers and commissioning
editors to widen their vision have been made. Such wider vision
is a crucial element in creating a successful collaboration that
both disabled people and broadcasters benefit from. The films
illustrate an under-utilised source of talent, a new vein of interest,
a wealth of intellect and ideas and the opportunity to represent
realistically, a significant number of the audience.
All positives that make the media executives listen. Conversely,
if we bang a drum and simply tell them they are doing it wrong,
the barriers increase, not diminish and disabled people will end
up seeing more well-intentioned but poorly thought out and unrepresentative
programming. Creation of ideas and talent are necessary pre-requisites
for working in the industry, irrespective of disability.
|
|
|